meshbay.git/packaging/deb/meshbay-hub, branch main

Update spec contact to devel@meshbay.org

2026-09-14T13:20:48Z

fix(packaging): the hub unit can start, and nothing carries the migration path

2026-09-12T14:36:54Z

`ExecStartPre` ran `alembic -c /opt/meshbay-hub/migrations/alembic.ini upgrade head`. The build does stage that file, so the path existed and the contents were wrong: `alembic.ini` resolves `script_location` with `%(here)s`, so the copy pointed at `/opt/meshbay-hub/migrations/src/meshbay_hub/db/migrations` — which nothing installs, because the migrations ship inside `meshbay_hub`, in the shared venv. `ExecStartPre` failing stops the unit. A hub installed from the RPM or the DEB could not start at all, and nothing noticed because the one live deployment was assembled by hand — the same shape as the node unit that carried `User=` into the user unit directory. The same `%(here)s` trap was already found once on the server, where a stray `alembic.ini` resolved to a month-old snapshot of the tree. Twice is a trap rather than an accident, so the fix is that the path is no longer written down anywhere: `meshbay-hub migrate` asks the installed package where its own migrations are, which is correct for the RPM, the DEB, a venv and a checkout. The build stages no `alembic.ini`; the repo keeps its own for `alembic revision` and for deploy scripts that already work. `env.py` now prefers a URL the caller resolved over re-reading the environment itself, so `migrate --config` connects with exactly the string the server will — one resolution, not two that agree until they do not. Six tests, three of which fail against the unit as it was. They read the directives rather than the file, because searching the whole thing finds the comment explaining a directive and calls that the directive. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4YmK41VsEURWFdop4EEeT

fix(packaging): ship the example hub config, and stop leaving /etc/meshbay open

2026-09-02T09:22:23Z

Three defects, found while answering whether installing the .deb would land where the production server was just moved to by hand. - **The example config was never packaged.** `build-hub.sh` copied `packaging/conf/hub.toml.example` under `if [ -f ]`, and that path does not exist in this repo — so every package ever built shipped no example at all and said nothing about it. The postinst places no config either, on purpose (a shipped hub.toml is overwritten on upgrade; a shipped secret gets run in production), which left an installed hub with nothing to copy from. The file now exists, documents every key `config.py` reads including the captcha `allowed_hosts` the desktop client needs, and the copy is a hard failure rather than a silent skip. - **`/etc/meshbay` was created 0755.** It holds the hub's Ed25519 private key and its database password. The file modes protect the contents, but a world-listable config directory tells anyone with a shell what a hub keeps and where. Now 0750 root:meshbay, in both the deb postinst and the rpm scriptlet; the service reads it by group. - **The rpm would have failed to build on the new file.** `%files` claimed nothing under /etc, and rpmbuild refuses an installed file no line claims. It now declares the directory and the example, with explicit `%attr` and `%config` so an operator's edits become .rpmsave rather than vanishing. Package modes no longer follow the builder's umask either — the same source tree produced 775/664 on a machine with umask 002 and 755/644 with 022. `install -m` sets them. Verified by building: the deb now carries ./etc/meshbay/ at drwxr-x--- with hub.toml.example at 0644, and the embedded postinst tightens the directory as belt and braces rather than as the only thing making it right. The rpm path is unverified — no rpmbuild on this machine. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014UtzVrzM7e2tG9fSpkR9ML

feat(packaging): 4-package .deb/.rpm build system under /opt

2026-08-31T08:49:45Z

Shared venv architecture: meshbay-common owns the Python venv with all pip deps pre-installed; hub and node add only their code into it. Client is a standalone Electron app. No pip runs at install time. - Add build scripts (packaging/build/) for common, hub, node, client - Add orchestrator build-packages.sh with deb/rpm auto-detection - Add .deb control/postinst for all 4 packages - Add .rpm specs for all 4 packages (replaces python3-meshbay-common) - Add Gnome .desktop launcher and icon resizing - Add firewalld services (meshbay-cast, meshbay-node) and UFW profiles - Update systemd units to use /opt/meshbay-common/venv/bin/ paths - TMDB token baked into node package at build time via QE/node.env - Fix package-lock.json sync for protobufjs override Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6

chore: release 0.2.0

2026-08-14T18:54:47Z

All three packages together, as the conventions require, plus the RPM and DEB metadata and their changelogs. The tag said 0.2 while every package announced 0.1.0, which would have shipped an RPM claiming to be the reviewed build while containing a different protocol: the hub schema lost the user identity keys, tokens lost pk_user, and gek_bundle_store left the wire. Pre-1.0, a breaking change bumps MINOR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5

chore: add RPM/DEB packaging artifacts — 5.10

2026-08-09T03:19:13Z

3 packages: python3-meshbay-common (dep), meshbay-hub, meshbay-node. RPM: spec files with pre/post scriptlets (useradd, systemd macros). DEB: DEBIAN/control + postinst for hub, control for node + common. Systemd: hub.service (system, security hardening) + node.service (user template @%i, EnvironmentFile for MESHBAY_UNLOCK_KEY). packaging/README.md: build + install instructions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context)