aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-client/package.json
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* fix(client): the desktop client runs, and running it corrected three thingsChristophe Besson2026-08-181-6/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Electron 42 / Chromium 148, launched under xvfb. The packaged interface mounts over `app://` with a secure context, `crypto.subtle` present, Argon2 WASM loaded, and no console errors. Three statements in the design were wrong, and only launching it found them. **A CSP in a `<meta>` tag silently drops `frame-ancestors`.** Chromium says so in the console. A policy carrying a directive that does nothing is worse than one without it, so the policy is sent as a header by the protocol handler — which is also the only thing serving the interface, so one source instead of two. **`secure: true` is not what makes the service worker register.** Chromium refuses a worker on a custom scheme whatever its privileges: "The URL protocol of the current origin ('app://meshbay') is not supported". The application has no service worker and needs none — it saves through a native dialog, which is the better of the two paths. `sw.js` stays in the package because the same files serve the browser, where it is one of only three ways to write a large file. What `secure: true` is actually for was measured at the same time: without it **the whole of `crypto.subtle` is undefined**. The first probe loaded a `data:` URL and every algorithm failed with TypeError, AES-GCM included — which is why the probe was rewritten before believing its answer. X25519 and Ed25519 are both present on Chromium 148, settling the version floor left open as O6. **The renderer cannot call the hub.** Its origin is `app://meshbay` and CORS refuses it. The hub has *no CORS middleware at all* — its API is reachable from no web origin whatever — and that is worth keeping. Widening it for `app://meshbay` would be worse than it looks: that origin is not a credential, since any Electron application can claim the same scheme and host name. So every hub call leaves from the main process, exactly as saving a file does, and it refuses any origin that is not the hub the user signed in to. `platform.apiFetch()` is `fetch` in a browser and the bridge in the application, so no caller has to know which it got. `transport.js` reaches it through a global because it is a classic script, not a module — the alternative was a second fetch path, which is how two callers of one hub start disagreeing about how to reach it. Verified from inside Electron: the main process gets 200 from /v1/hub/version, the renderer is refused by CORS, and **a script served by the hub is refused by the policy** — T3's mitigation demonstrated rather than asserted. Build note, written into the README because it will bite the next person: **Ubuntu 24.04's nodejs 18 cannot install Electron at all** — the download script `require()`s an ESM module, which Node gained in 22. Node 24 LTS, checksum-verified against nodejs.org, is what this was built with. package-lock.json is committed; builds use `npm ci`, not `npm install`. 799 tests pass, e2e.py still passes end to end. The session harness needed a platform stub: it lifts `hubFetch` out of app.js as text and runs it, so the adapter is now part of the environment it models. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(client): the platform seam, and an Electron shell that has never been runChristophe Besson2026-08-181-0/+29
Stage D, and the honest half of it. D1 — the seam (done, and verified) ---------------------------------- `static/platform.js`. `HUB` becomes `platform.hubBase()` and the transport is built with the same base, so one address has one source. In a browser it returns '' and every path stays relative to the origin that served the page — the acceptance criterion for this split was "the browser SPA behaves identically", and it does. `platform.js` joins `_ASSETS`, or a change to it would not move the content hash and a cached browser would never ask for it. D2 — the shell (written, never launched) ----------------------------------------- **There is no npm on this machine. Electron was never installed and `packages/meshbay-client/` has not been run once.** That is stated here rather than discovered later. What is there: a main process serving the packaged interface over a privileged `app://` scheme (`secure` and `standard` are not cosmetic — without them the service worker refuses to register and streamed downloads break silently), a preload exposing an enumerated bridge that never passes a filesystem path, a window with `sandbox`, `contextIsolation` and no node integration, navigation away from the package refused, and a CSP where the hub is reachable over connect-src and is not a script source. The hub address arrives as a process argument because `platform.hubBase()` runs before anything can await. `test_desktop_shell.py` pins each of those by reading the source — the treatment `test_downloads.py` already gives the three browser save paths. It catches a property being removed and proves nothing about the application running. Two were checked by breaking them. The interface is *copied* into the package by `build/sync-ui.js` from the hub's static directory, and `ui/` is gitignored: a silent fork is the only real way to end up maintaining the interface twice. D3 — partial ------------ The bridge, and the part worth having now: safeStorage's backend is reported rather than assumed. On Linux it falls back to a fixed key when no keyring is running, silently — someone who believes the OS is holding their keys is told when it is not. The native key lifecycle belongs with D4 and needs a running application to mean anything. D8 — partial, and a real defect found -------------------------------------- `meshbay-node.spec` installed the SYSTEM template — the one carrying `User=%i` — into `%{_userunitdir}`. A user unit already runs as its owner and cannot carry `User=`; systemd refuses the file, so the packaged unit could never have started. Nothing noticed because nobody had built and installed the RPM. Two units now: the template to `%{_unitdir}`, and a new `meshbay-node-user.service` that a person enables themselves without a password — which is what lets the desktop client install a node without asking for one. It carries ExecReload, so `meshbay-node reload` does not have to stop a service somebody is streaming from, and documents the drop-in for a drive outside the home, RequiresMountsFor included. 798 tests pass; e2e.py still passes end to end. Nothing here was built or launched: no npm, no rpmbuild. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>