| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The audience split stopped a member's node credential from opening the hub API.
It did not stop the credential being *replayed to another node*: the MNP token
carried the member's whole group set and named no node, so a token handed to
node A's operator could be presented to node B the member also belongs to. That
does not read content on B — the handshake still requires proving node B's group
key, which the operator lacks — but it reaches B's pre-proof window and fetches
the member's *encrypted* keypair bundle for B (offline-attackable, bounded,
audited): a disclosure §2.4 says should not follow from hosting a member on A.
The token now names the node it is minted for (a `node` claim = that node's
Ed25519 key), and authorize_token refuses one that names a different key. The
client already knows the target node's key (from /v1/groups/{id}/nodes) and asks
for a token bound to it: POST /v1/nodes/mnp-token takes node_pk, and
transport.connect threads it (group-page, the connection pool and rewrap pass
n.pk_node; reconnect preserves it). A token that names no node is still
accepted, because the hub only mints one for the authenticated requester, so an
unbound token grants nothing across accounts — which also keeps non-binding
callers working with no churn.
Done before deploy, so it folds into the MNP 4.0 flag day rather than needing
its own. Docs: §5.2, register E10, MESHBAY_NODE_PROTOCOL.md §6.3.
test_handshake.py and test_mnp_token.py hold the binding (a token for node A is
refused by node B, accepted by node A; an unbound token still works); red
before, green after. common/node/hub suites green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|