aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-node/tests/test_partial_uploads.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* fix(node): take the availability poll and every upload write off the loopChristophe Besson7 days1-24/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The rest of AV9's disk half. Serving a file left the loop in the commit before this one; two paths were still on it. **The availability poll.** `RootSet.refresh_availability` stats every root, and eleven call sites reached it from `async def` — the reconcile loop among them, on a timer. On a sleeping disk that is a stall once per tick, and the stat is also what keeps the disk awake, so a node paid spin-up for a library nobody was reading. All eleven now go through `off_disk`, `Root.is_live` included. **The upload write.** `open`/`write`, and the resolve, the stat, the free-name search, the rename and the unlink around it. This one could not simply be awaited: the handler was synchronous, so nothing could come between the `chunk_index != state.next_index` check and the `advance` that answers it, and that is the whole of the chunk-ordering rule. Awaiting the write opens the gap — chunk 1 arriving while chunk 0 is in the disk thread reads a position that has not moved and is refused as out of order, so an upload would fail on a slow disk and nowhere else. Verified, not assumed: without the lock the new ordering test refuses three chunks of four. So the check, the write and the advance are one critical section again, under a lock held **per group**. Not per session: `partial_uploads` lives in the group context so a reconnecting client finds its upload where it left it, which means two sessions of one member share the position of one `.part` file. Arrival order is preserved by construction — the dispatcher creates one task per message as it arrives, tasks start in creation order, and the lock is the first thing each one waits on, so its waiters queue in arrival order too. `_do_file_upload` is a coroutine now, which is why forty-two test call sites gain an `await`. Their outcomes are unchanged, file by file, against the run before the change. `test_ops.py` asked which public coroutines `ops` exposes and got `off_disk`, imported rather than defined there. It now asks for the ones written in the module, which is what its own docstring means; all forty-three operations are still checked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: resume an interrupted upload, and pause oneChristophe Besson2026-09-091-0/+129
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Stage 8 of ~/next/improve-downloads.md, second half, plus the gap it exposed in stage 7. **Asking where to resume.** The node identifies an upload by (member, directory, filename), so a client resuming one has to name the file — and `transfer_open`, the obvious place to ask, travels in clear. Naming it there would undo exactly what sealing this path bought in MNP 2.0: before it, the same file was ciphertext leaving a node and plaintext arriving at one. So the question is asked inside the seal that already exists, as an ordinary `file_upload` with no bytes and `chunk_index: -1`. The node writes nothing, creates no state, reserves no name, and answers with `resume_from` in the sealed ack. A node that predates it refuses the index, which the client reads as "start from the beginning" — the behaviour it had anyway — and the wait is bounded so one that answers neither does not strand an upload. The probe is answered after every check the write path makes, so it cannot ask questions about a directory the caller may not write to, and it answers only about the member who asks: otherwise one member could measure another's progress on a file they never sent, and worse, resume it. **Pausing an upload.** Reported: no pause button on an upload, even in the desktop app. Stage 7 built pause around the download path — a target declares whether it can be stopped — and an upload has no local target to ask. It was also refused by design, since a transfer handed a lease it cannot re-create must not be offered a button that would drop its slot for good. Uploads now ask for their slot rather than being handed one, and say they are pausable outright: a File is seekable and the node keeps the position. Resuming re-probes rather than trusting the client's own memory, so it works across a reconnect too. **And the slot they hold.** `_do_file_upload` never called `slots.touch(tr)`. Chunks are not gated by the lease, so the file arrived — but the node reclaimed a grant nobody appeared to be using after thirty seconds, twice, then abandoned it, and the widget follows the lease. Measured from the journal: a 3.5 GB upload read "waiting, 0 ahead" for a minute and a half while it was transferring. The download twin of this was fixed on 2026-09-08; the same omission was still here, invisible until uploads took a real lease. `test_the_upload_itself_is_sealed` now checks every message `uploadFile` sends rather than the first. Adding the probe put a second one in front of the one it was written for, and it would have kept passing while guarding nothing. Node suite 1202 passed, hub suite 850 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HCGdheDLxGReuKHga3BtST
* feat(node): uploads outlive their connection, and their leftovers are reapedChristophe Besson2026-09-091-0/+360
Stage 8 of ~/next/improve-downloads.md, first half. Two defects that are the same defect seen from two sides. An upload's progress lived on the session, keyed by `rel_dir/filename`. A dropped connection threw it away and the client's next chunk was refused with `not_started`: an upload interrupted at 99% could only be started again from zero, on a link flaky enough to have interrupted it once. It now lives in the group context, keyed by member as well -- a shared directory means two people can be sending IMG_1234.jpg at the same moment and neither may inherit, or overwrite the position of, the other's. What the lost state left behind was a `.part` nothing would ever finish, delete or look at again. It is not an index entry, so it is invisible to every member and to the operator's own file list: one abandoned film is a gigabyte of their disk, kept for ever. That leak predates this branch. A `.part` is deleted only when **both** hold: no upload is writing it, and nothing has been written to it for 24 hours. Waiting costs disk; being wrong costs somebody their upload, and is not reversible -- so a read-only root is never walked (it cannot have received an upload), an unavailable one is never walked (an unmounted drive reporting "nothing found" is how a careless janitor deletes a library), and a file whose mtime is in the future is left alone (a clock that went backwards is not evidence). The reaper matches whole paths and the state records the path it is writing, rather than both sides rebuilding one from a root name -- two implementations of one rule whose failure mode is deleting a live upload. The rules are in `uploads.py`, pure logic with no asyncio and no transport, the same shape as `transfers.py` and for the same reason. 23 cases, four of them checked against the unfixed source. Node suite 1195 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HCGdheDLxGReuKHga3BtST