summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-node/tests/test_root_writable_policy.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* refactor(mnp)!: one answer to "may this member write", and it is the rootChristophe Besson2026-09-101-14/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The group-wide `member_upload` switch is gone: the message, the signed operation, the field on the handshake ack, the `upload` alias on every root in the index payload, and the client's fallback path to it. Whether a member may write has been a property of each root for a while, and that is the model that survives: a single flag over the group cannot express "this library is published read-only and that folder is a drop box", which is the ordinary arrangement. What was left of the switch was a handler that logged a deprecation and acted on nothing, and a client that read `ack.member_upload` whenever the roots carried no `writable` — a second source for one question, with whichever the code consulted first deciding it. `roots.describe()` drops `upload` for the same reason: it was `writable` under an older name, and two names for one boolean is one too many. The paperclip now says "nowhere to write" rather than picking a root, in a group that has none writable. That is the honest answer; the fallback picked whatever came first and failed at send time. Node suite 1215 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AsoWC3GmhNdwVFomW3QjH3
* feat(mnp)!: seal the upload under the group keyChristophe Besson2026-09-071-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Downloads have been encrypted under a GEK-derived key since the beginning: `file_chunk` and `stream_data` both go through `chunk_ciphertext`. Uploads never were. `file_upload` carried the filename and the raw bytes in plain msgpack, and `file_upload_ack` carried the name the node stored them under — so the same file was ciphertext leaving a node and plaintext arriving at one. There was no threat model behind that asymmetry. Both halves now travel sealed under a third groupbox purpose, HKDF(GEK, info="meshbay:upload:v1"). The filename, the destination folder and the bytes are all inside the seal; only `upload_id` and `chunk_index` stay in clear, because the node routes and orders on them before it can decrypt. This direction seals *towards* the node — it holds the GEK for its own group — and it opens the payload before it picks a destination or touches the disk. What that forced, and why none of it is optional: - `filename` was the correlation key on both sides. It cannot be: matching an ack to its request by name would hand back exactly what the seal hides. `upload_id` replaces it — client-drawn, opaque to the node, unique within a connection, never an authorization input. The property it guarded (one refusal fails one upload, not every upload in flight) is unchanged. - Refusals can no longer quote what they refused. `No directory named 'X'` becomes `No such directory in this group` plus the `code` that was already there; the client knows what it sent. - No plaintext fallback. A path that still accepts plaintext is not a sealed path, so an unsealed `file_upload` is refused with `upload_not_sealed`. Hardened while here, because what comes out of a seal is authenticated but not validated — a member can seal anything: `filename` and `data` have their types checked before any upload state is created, and `chunk_index`/`total_chunks`, which are outside the seal by necessity, can no longer raise where a refusal was meant. Tests. `test_upload_sealed.py` pins the node half: nothing identifying on the wire, tamper/wrong-key/wrong-group all refused with nothing written, and multi-chunk reassembly unchanged. `test_upload_seal_client.py` drives the shipped `uploadFile` over the shipped `crypto.js` under node and feeds its real frames to the real `_do_file_upload` — the file lands intact, and the ack the node actually produced comes back with the name it chose for a collision, which is the half a source-reading test cannot see. Both upload purposes join the JS/Python groupbox parity vectors. BREAKING CHANGE: MNP 2.0. `file_upload`/`file_upload_ack` change shape on the wire every deployed client speaks, which is MAJOR by the same rule 1.0 was — but the break is confined to uploads. `MNP_MIN_SUPPORTED` stays at "1.0", so a 1.x peer still connects, browses, downloads, streams and chats; only its uploads are refused, with a message saying which side is old. The client checks the node's version before sending a chunk, so neither side meets this as a timeout. This is the version negotiation shipped in 1.0 earning its keep: 1.0 cost a flag day, 2.0 costs a refusal code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AsoWC3GmhNdwVFomW3QjH3
* feat(client): bring back New folder, icon-only — and close the hole it openedChristophe Besson2026-09-061-0/+41
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The control was hidden and its `canCreateDir` left computed and unused. It is back in the Files toolbar as an icon: the toolbar already carries one labelled primary action, and a second beside it competes for the width the breadcrumb trail needs. The name is in `title` *and* `aria-label` — a title is invisible to a screen reader on a button with no text, so an icon-only control without both is simply unnamed for anyone not reading with their eyes. Its gate changes. It required `isNodeAdmin`, which contradicted the node's own rule — "making a directory is not a privileged act; a member who can add a file can organise where it goes" — and hid the control from everyone who could have used it. It now follows the Upload button: a writable root, and not at the top of a group, where the level is the set of roots rather than a directory on anyone's disk. Restoring it surfaced a real gap. `_do_dir_create` never learned about RO/RW: `_do_file_upload` gained the `writable` check with the model and this one did not, so a member refused a file in a published library could still leave empty directories all through it, and could write to a drive mid-eject. Read-only has to mean read-only for every way of writing, not just for files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011pvMdvLBG92jyhvD5pD6us
* feat(node): an upload lands in the folder it was sent toChristophe Besson2026-09-061-3/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is no `uploads/` subdirectory any more, and the client names the folder rather than the root. It was the last of v5's quarantine — the per-user layer went on 2026-08-14 for the same reason — and it goes on the same grounds: a folder appearing beside the operator's library because somebody sent a file is the node deciding how their disk is arranged. Somebody dropping a file into the folder they are looking at expects it to be in that folder. **What made the quarantine worth having was never the subdirectory.** It is the filename allowlist, the size cap, the chunk ordering and the no-overwrite rule, and all four are untouched: an existing file is never replaced, the second sender of IMG_1234.jpg gets a free name, and the check still sits at the write. Letting the client choose the destination is safe for one reason and only one: it is resolved through `RootSet.resolve()`, which refuses `..`, absolute segments and anything whose resolved form escapes its root, symlinks included. A member answers "which of this group's folders", never "which path on the operator's disk" — and the test that used to assert the node chose now asserts that, with six shapes of escape. `direct` goes with it. Its only job was to say "no subdirectory for this root", which is now every root, and a config flag that does nothing is worse than none. Chat's attachment folder finally does something: the directory the operator picks in the Chat settings pane is where attachments are written, falling back to the first writable root while they have not chosen one, or if the one they chose has since been made read-only or ejected — a stale choice should not become a refusal at send time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011pvMdvLBG92jyhvD5pD6us
* fix(groups): finish Phase 1 — MNP root management, upload targets, eject stateChristophe Besson2026-09-061-0/+203
Review of the Phase 1 commit found the RO/RW model sound but three paths unfinished, each of which broke the flow the phase exists to deliver. Plus 29 test failures it introduced and no coverage for anything it added. Uploads went to the wrong directory. The node read a `root` field on file_upload that no client ever sent, so every upload landed in the first writable root while the Files toolbar offered its button based on the root being browsed — with two writable roots, uploading from one wrote into the other. Files now names the root it is showing; Chat names one chosen in the shell (an operator-configured directory arrives in Phase 2); the node refuses an unknown name rather than falling back, and refuses read-only and ejected roots by code. Shared directories were unreachable on the web. The table read its roots only from the loopback API, which resolves to "not available" in a browser, so the section rendered for nobody there — while the Uploads controls it replaced had worked — and the transport.updateRoot/ejectRoot/plugRoot methods beside it were dead. MNP is now the path, loopback the fallback for a local node with no live connection, and adding a root over MNP takes a typed path since no web page can browse a remote disk. Ejecting updated nobody's screen. transport.js resolves an admin ack against the pending request and returns, which is right for every op whose caller knows the value it chose; the root acks carry state only the node can compute, so the operator who clicked Eject was the one client that never saw it happen. And the ejected flag reached roster.db but was never read back, so a restart undid it and the next scan read an empty mount point as an erased library. Also: the member-upload endpoint answered 200 and did nothing (removed); the wizard ignored the first root's RW switch; reload compared roots on name and path, so editing writable in node.toml did nothing; the table had no path column, which is the only thing separating two libraries sharing a basename; apps_enabled normalisation differed between the two sides of a signed subject. Tests: eject/plug, per-root upload refusal and the node.toml rewrite had no coverage at all. test_member_upload_policy.py is replaced by test_root_writable_policy.py — it tested a removed feature — and every property worth keeping from it moved rather than being dropped. Docs: draft-v6 structural decision 9 is annotated as superseded (the operator can no longer have a directory only they may write to — a real capability removed, flagged rather than hidden), the man page documents the root verb and the RO/RW fields, and refactor-groups.md §7b records what the plan got wrong. Suite: 41 failures before, 13 after — all 13 pre-existing on main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011pvMdvLBG92jyhvD5pD6us