aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-node/tests/test_root_writable_policy.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* feat(node): an upload lands in the folder it was sent toChristophe Besson2026-09-061-3/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is no `uploads/` subdirectory any more, and the client names the folder rather than the root. It was the last of v5's quarantine — the per-user layer went on 2026-08-14 for the same reason — and it goes on the same grounds: a folder appearing beside the operator's library because somebody sent a file is the node deciding how their disk is arranged. Somebody dropping a file into the folder they are looking at expects it to be in that folder. **What made the quarantine worth having was never the subdirectory.** It is the filename allowlist, the size cap, the chunk ordering and the no-overwrite rule, and all four are untouched: an existing file is never replaced, the second sender of IMG_1234.jpg gets a free name, and the check still sits at the write. Letting the client choose the destination is safe for one reason and only one: it is resolved through `RootSet.resolve()`, which refuses `..`, absolute segments and anything whose resolved form escapes its root, symlinks included. A member answers "which of this group's folders", never "which path on the operator's disk" — and the test that used to assert the node chose now asserts that, with six shapes of escape. `direct` goes with it. Its only job was to say "no subdirectory for this root", which is now every root, and a config flag that does nothing is worse than none. Chat's attachment folder finally does something: the directory the operator picks in the Chat settings pane is where attachments are written, falling back to the first writable root while they have not chosen one, or if the one they chose has since been made read-only or ejected — a stale choice should not become a refusal at send time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011pvMdvLBG92jyhvD5pD6us
* fix(groups): finish Phase 1 — MNP root management, upload targets, eject stateChristophe Besson2026-09-061-0/+203
Review of the Phase 1 commit found the RO/RW model sound but three paths unfinished, each of which broke the flow the phase exists to deliver. Plus 29 test failures it introduced and no coverage for anything it added. Uploads went to the wrong directory. The node read a `root` field on file_upload that no client ever sent, so every upload landed in the first writable root while the Files toolbar offered its button based on the root being browsed — with two writable roots, uploading from one wrote into the other. Files now names the root it is showing; Chat names one chosen in the shell (an operator-configured directory arrives in Phase 2); the node refuses an unknown name rather than falling back, and refuses read-only and ejected roots by code. Shared directories were unreachable on the web. The table read its roots only from the loopback API, which resolves to "not available" in a browser, so the section rendered for nobody there — while the Uploads controls it replaced had worked — and the transport.updateRoot/ejectRoot/plugRoot methods beside it were dead. MNP is now the path, loopback the fallback for a local node with no live connection, and adding a root over MNP takes a typed path since no web page can browse a remote disk. Ejecting updated nobody's screen. transport.js resolves an admin ack against the pending request and returns, which is right for every op whose caller knows the value it chose; the root acks carry state only the node can compute, so the operator who clicked Eject was the one client that never saw it happen. And the ejected flag reached roster.db but was never read back, so a restart undid it and the next scan read an empty mount point as an erased library. Also: the member-upload endpoint answered 200 and did nothing (removed); the wizard ignored the first root's RW switch; reload compared roots on name and path, so editing writable in node.toml did nothing; the table had no path column, which is the only thing separating two libraries sharing a basename; apps_enabled normalisation differed between the two sides of a signed subject. Tests: eject/plug, per-root upload refusal and the node.toml rewrite had no coverage at all. test_member_upload_policy.py is replaced by test_root_writable_policy.py — it tested a removed feature — and every property worth keeping from it moved rather than being dropped. Docs: draft-v6 structural decision 9 is annotated as superseded (the operator can no longer have a directory only they may write to — a real capability removed, flagged rather than hidden), the man page documents the root verb and the RO/RW fields, and refactor-groups.md §7b records what the plan got wrong. Suite: 41 failures before, 13 after — all 13 pre-existing on main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011pvMdvLBG92jyhvD5pD6us