| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
draft-v5 §7 rewritten around the keypair bundle, because that is where the last
open finding actually lives. New §7.1 states the adversary (an operator holding
their own node's disk), what cracking a bundle yields (identity keys, hence
content on *other* nodes and the ability to sign as that user — not the content
they host in the clear by design), and the measured numbers rather than
adjectives: PBKDF2 241 ms vs Argon2id 88 ms natively, a GPU ceiling moving from
~8k to ~2k guesses/s, six days for a 10⁹ dictionary run, four random words
outlasting the sun. The honest summary is in there too — a factor of four on one
card, not a thousand; what it buys is the cost of scale.
§2 gains the row the table never had: **your identity keys stay yours**, ⚠️
against a malicious node operator. An operator hosts your content by design, and
that was documented; that they can also try to become *you* was not. That is the
difference between reading what they host and reading what other operators host.
§4 records that the challenge now carries `node_pk`, why (a first-time member
signs a transcript naming the node and has no GEK to complete a handshake with),
and that it is checked against the ack rather than trusted. Also that refusals
carry a code, and what `not_a_member` usually means.
§8.1 states the multi-browser property plainly — one identity across browsers,
recovered with the passphrase, no second code — together with its cost, since it
is the same mechanism as C4.
invite-pairing-v1 is no longer "a proposal": it shipped. §9bis gains the four
browser-found failures and their common thread — e2e.py is a second
implementation of the client, written in the right order by construction, so it
proves the protocol and nothing about app.js.
CLAUDE.md gets the two things a future session must not rediscover the hard way:
the KDF parameters live in three places held identical by a parity test, and an
unbounded await on the hub socket makes a node silently unreachable (three found).
second-review: C4 marked reduced, not closed. devel-phases-next: 12.2's CSP must
keep `wasm-unsafe-eval`, or the strict policy locks every user out of their keys.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
draft-v5 §2: against an active hub, reading content moves from "❌ H3" to
"❌ T3 (browser) · ✅ native". The defensible sentence becomes "the hub cannot
read your content unless it ships you malicious client code" — T3 is now the only
path, it is an artifact rather than a silent directory lie, and it does not exist
for a native client. New §5.5 describes admission and key delivery, with the four
properties that carry it and the one exception (open-join groups, where the hub
can walk in the front door — a property of open joining, and the setting is read
from node.toml).
Corrected while writing it: §5.1 said the C5b fix stopped a group admin who does
not run the node from inviting, and that the redesign reverses this. It does not,
because delegation was deferred. What changed is the timing — the operator issues
a code and is then out of the loop.
devel-phases-next: 12.1 is done and NOT as written. The plan was key transparency
plus safety numbers; what shipped removes the directory read instead. Safety
numbers make substitution detectable by a human who checks, at first contact,
when there is nothing to check against. 12.2 (served-SPA integrity) is now the
highest-value item in that phase. Phase 14 marked for what landed.
second-review: H3 and M3 annotated closed at the finding, with what actually
closed them. The §7 verdict table is left intact — it is the record of an audit
on a date, and falsifying it would be worse than leaving it — with a note
pointing at draft-v5 §2 for current state.
CLAUDE.md matters most here, being loaded every session: NS4 read "admin_pk_ed25519
auto-pinned from keystore ✅ DONE", which is M3 described as a feature. Rewritten,
with the two fixes that must never be attempted (auto-pin, hub lookup).
QE/deploy/README.md: set-admin-pk retired from the walkthrough; the regression
checklist now exercises pairing, joining by code, recognition without a code, and
revocation.
USERGUIDE.md is beyond the invite work but was actively wrong: it told users to
POST GEK bundles to a hub endpoint deleted in Phase 12, and to re-wrap for every
remaining member on revocation. Both replaced with what the code does.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
|
Second architecture and security review (second-review.md): 6 critical and
7 high findings against the Phase 12 implementation, plus an assessment of
whether the system meets its end-to-end confidentiality claim.
Roadmap rewritten against those findings (devel-phases-next.md): new blocking
Phase 11.5 (security remediation), Phase 12 (hub minimization), Phase 13
(native desktop client). Old phases 12-17 renumbered to 14-19.
tmp-decisions.md records two open decisions: whether the hub keeps serving
the web UI, and browser extension vs native desktop client vs both.
CLAUDE.md and devel-phases-next.md also carry pre-existing Phase 12 edits from
the working tree that could not be cleanly separated from the review changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|