From 5bce0acad6d10f9b952874f1359406b4eae3a8f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christophe Besson Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:46:48 +0200 Subject: docs: drop the invitation-link plan from the tree The plan was a working document; what it decided lives in MESHBAY_DESIGN.md and MESHBAY_NODE_PROTOCOL.md. Code and tests now cite those instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 --- packages/meshbay-common/src/meshbay_common/adminop.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'packages/meshbay-common/src') diff --git a/packages/meshbay-common/src/meshbay_common/adminop.py b/packages/meshbay-common/src/meshbay_common/adminop.py index 23040be..c679718 100644 --- a/packages/meshbay-common/src/meshbay_common/adminop.py +++ b/packages/meshbay-common/src/meshbay_common/adminop.py @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ ADMIN_TRANSCRIPT_PREFIX = b"meshbay:admin:v1" OP_FILE_DELETE = "file_delete" OP_DIR_DELETE = "dir_delete" OP_INVITE_CREATE = "invite_create" -# An invitation bound to no account (docs/invite-links.md). Its own op rather +# An invitation bound to no account (docs/MESHBAY_DESIGN.md §3.4). Its own op rather # than `invite_create` with an empty subject: that subject is the invitee, and # what the operator is shown before signing has to name the outcome (H5) — here # "a link into this group", `link:`. -- cgit v1.2.3