1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
|
# MeshBay — Next Implementation Phases
> Base: Phases 1–8 complete. 117 tests. demo-v3 validated against meshbay.org.
> Architecture reference: docs/meshbay-draft-v4.md
> First security review: first-review.md (2026-08-10)
---
## Phase 7 — Node v2 : production, streaming, chat ✅ DONE
Commit: fc56585 — 26 files, +2155/−159 lines, 109 tests.
| # | Component | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | JWT group claims + node authz check | ✅ |
| 7.1 | QUIC 0-RTT session resumption | ✅ |
| 7.2 | Signaling `client_incoming`/`punch_ready` + jti denylist push | ✅ |
| 7.3 | Multi-group daemon (1-port multiplexing) | ✅ |
| 7.4 | HLS streaming via QUIC | ✅ |
| 7.5 | Chat: Sender Keys protocol + storage + MNP wire | ✅ |
| 7.6 | Chat: local web UI + WS push to members | ✅ |
---
## Phase 8 — Hub v2: admin, federation, security ✅ DONE
Commit: 46918ec — 20 files, +508/−90 lines, 117 tests.
Deployed to meshbay.org. Existing emails encrypted. DB schema migrated.
| # | Component | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | Admin roles — config-based `require_admin` | ✅ S1 resolved |
| 8.2 | Email encrypted at rest — AES-256-GCM, HKDF | ✅ S2 resolved |
| 8.3 | Refresh token rotation — family-based reuse detection | ✅ S5 resolved |
| 8.4 | Federation DB persistence (HubPeer model) | ✅ |
| 8.5 | Federation token verification async (DB-backed) | ✅ |
| 8.6 | CSAM hash check in swarm registration | ✅ |
| 8.7 | Rate limiting on auth endpoints (5/10/20 per min) | ✅ |
| 8.8 | Healthcheck endpoint (GET /v1/health) | ✅ |
| 8.9 | IP log cleanup background task (365-day retention) | ✅ |
| 8.10 | Argon2id bumped to 256 MB (pw_version=2, rehash on login) | ✅ |
---
## Phase 9 — Web client: WebRTC transport + core SPA
**Objective:** a web browser can connect P2P to a node behind residential NAT,
browse files, download, stream video, and chat — with zero data through the hub.
**Architecture decisions (settled 2026-08-10):**
### Transport: WebRTC DataChannel for browsers
Native clients (desktop, Android) use QUIC with `punch_nat()` — already validated
in demo-v2 on SFR residential (Port-Restricted Cone NAT).
Browsers cannot use QUIC for NAT traversal because WebTransport does not allow
the browser to choose its UDP source port. Port-Restricted Cone NAT requires the
client to connect from the exact port the node probed — impossible for browsers.
**Solution:** WebRTC DataChannel with ICE/STUN. The browser's built-in WebRTC
stack handles NAT traversal automatically. The node uses `aiortc` (same author as
`aioquic`, already referenced in draft-v3 as [future]).
ICE is strictly superior to our custom `punch_nat()` for this use case:
- Both sides send STUN binding requests simultaneously → mutual hole-punching
- No need for the client to pre-announce its port
- Handles both sides behind NAT
- Battle-tested by billions of users (Google Meet, Discord, etc.)
The MNP protocol (handshake, file_request, file_chunk, chat_message, etc.) runs
identically over WebRTC DataChannel as over QUIC streams. Same E2E encryption.
**Node dual transport:**
- QUIC (port 19000) — native clients, already in place
- WebRTC DataChannel — browsers, using `aiortc`
### Signaling: hub WebSocket relay
The hub relays WebRTC signaling (SDP offer/answer, ICE candidates) between
browser and node. This is the same role described in draft-v3 section 4.1.3:
"NAT traversal coordination [...] stateless [...] <1 KB per message."
```
Browser → Hub (HTTPS) : POST /v1/nodes/{id}/webrtc/offer {sdp, ice_candidates}
Hub → Node (WS) : {type: "webrtc_offer", sdp, ice_candidates, peer_id}
Node → Hub (WS) : {type: "webrtc_answer", sdp, ice_candidates, peer_id}
Hub → Browser (SSE) : {sdp, ice_candidates}
```
After signaling, the DataChannel is P2P. Hub is no longer involved.
### UI: Preact SPA
- **Framework:** Preact (~3 KB gzipped) + preact-router
- **Build:** esbuild (single binary, no node_modules bloat) for minification
- **Theming:** CSS `prefers-color-scheme` + localStorage toggle (dark/light)
- **i18n:** JSON translation files loaded client-side, English default
- **Responsive:** sidebar collapses to hamburger on mobile viewports
- **Crypto:** existing `crypto.js` (SubtleCrypto AES-GCM) for E2E decryption
### Hub role (reminder — fundamental constraint)
The hub is a registrar and signaling facilitator. It stores ONLY:
- User accounts (login, encrypted email, public keys, keypair bundle)
- Group metadata (name, admin, members, GEK bundles — no file indexes)
- Node registrations (endpoint hints, public keys)
All data (files, streams, chat messages, directory indexes) lives on mesh nodes.
Clients (web or native) transfer data E2E with nodes. The hub never touches
content. This is non-negotiable.
### Chat/forum storage
Chat messages are stored on the node(s) hosting the group, not on the hub.
The browser retrieves chat history from the node via DataChannel, same as files.
If no node in the group is online, the group (including chat) is unavailable.
This is inherent to the P2P model and acceptable.
### File search
Content is not indexed on the hub. Search works client-side:
- Node provides a Mesh Group Index (file metadata: names, paths, sizes, hashes)
- For private groups, the index is GEK-encrypted — hub stores it opaque, client decrypts
- Browser caches decrypted indexes in IndexedDB (~50–100 MB quota, extensible)
- Search runs locally on cached indexes — instant, no network call, no hub involvement
### Milestones
| # | Component | Files | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | **Spike: WebRTC DataChannel on node** | `aiortc` integration, 4 tests (handshake, file transfer, auth, guard) | ✅ |
| 9.2 | WebRTC signaling endpoints on hub | `hub/api/signaling.py` — relay SDP/ICE, 2 tests | ✅ |
| 9.3 | WebRTC→MNP transport adapter on node | `node/transport/webrtc_server.py` + hub_client WebRTC handler | ✅ |
| 9.4 | `transport.js` — browser WebRTC client | `static/transport.js` — connect, handshake, fetch, msgpack | ✅ |
| 9.5 | **Spike: E2E browser→NAT→node file transfer** | Mobile 4G → SFR NAT → node, IPv4 STUN + IPv6 validated | ✅ |
| 9.6 | Preact SPA shell (login, routing, theme) | `static/app.js`, `static/css/style.css` | High |
| 9.7 | Group list + file explorer UI | `static/components/GroupList.js`, `FileExplorer.js` | High |
| 9.8 | File download via DataChannel | `static/components/Download.js` — chunk reassembly | High |
| 9.9 | Video streaming via DataChannel | HLS segments → MediaSource API | Medium |
| 9.10 | Chat/forum UI via DataChannel | `static/components/ChatView.js` — Sender Keys | Medium |
| 9.11 | i18n framework + English strings | `static/i18n/en.json` | Medium |
| 9.12 | Settings UI (profile, theme, notifications) | `static/components/Settings.js` | Medium |
| 9.13 | Tests: unit + integration | WebRTC transport, MNP over DataChannel | High |
**Critical path validated (2026-08-10):** 9.1 → 9.5 all pass. WebRTC DataChannel
works browser → node through SFR residential NAT, confirmed with three scenarios:
| Test | ICE path | Result |
|---|---|---|
| WiFi LAN (same network) | IPv6 direct | OK, ~100ms |
| Mobile 4G SFR + IPv6 | IPv6 inter-network | OK, ~600ms |
| Mobile 4G SFR + IPv4 only | STUN hole-punch IPv4 | OK, ~650ms |
Node behind SFR Port-Restricted Cone NAT + mobile behind SFR CGNAT 4G.
No TURN relay needed. ICE/STUN handles both NAT types automatically.
**Dependencies added:**
- `aiortc>=1.9` in `meshbay-node/pyproject.toml` ✅
- `esbuild` as a dev tool (single binary, not npm) — needed for 9.6+
- `preact` + `preact-router` (ESM imports, no npm needed — CDN or vendored)
---
## Phase 10 — meshbay.org site + admin/moderation UI
**Objective:** meshbay.org becomes both a production hub and the project's public
website, with admin/moderation interfaces and user-facing features.
### Site architecture
Two layers, cleanly separated:
- **Generic hub** (API + web app) — reusable by any hub operator
- **Site overlay** — meshbay.org-specific pages (landing, /downloads, /about)
The site overlay is served by Caddy (static files) with priority over the hub.
The hub serves the SPA for authenticated users at `/app/`.
```
site/ # meshbay.org-specific (not in generic hub package)
├── index.html # Landing page — project promotion
├── downloads.html # Package repos (Ubuntu, Fedora, Android APK)
├── about.html # Project info, GitHub link, contact
└── assets/ # Landing page CSS/images
```
### User roles
| Role | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| `user` | Standard user — browse, download, chat, manage own profile |
| `moderator` | Review reports, suspend content/groups/users |
| `admin` | All moderator rights + hub management, user management, logs |
Role stored on User model. `require_moderator` dependency (checks role ≥ moderator).
`require_admin` already exists (Phase 8.1 — config-based, extended to DB role).
### Milestones
| # | Component | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| 10.1 | Landing page + /downloads + /about | High |
| 10.2 | Moderator role + `require_moderator` dependency | High |
| 10.3 | Moderation UI (report list, suspend content/group/user) | High |
| 10.4 | Admin UI (hub management, user list, logs viewer) | High |
| 10.5 | Notification system (invitations, new content, maintenance) | Medium |
| 10.6 | User settings (profile, per-group options, privacy, mute) | Medium |
| 10.7 | Public group search (name + keyword in description) | Medium |
| 10.8 | Front page (notifications feed, prioritized: contacts → private → public) | Medium |
| 10.9 | Package repositories (APT for Ubuntu, DNF for Fedora) | Medium |
| 10.10 | Auto-update check endpoint for clients | Low |
### Hub mirror (design only — implementation deferred)
A mirror hub is a complete replica of the primary hub (same user DB, same groups,
same GEK bundles, same storage). Purpose: load distribution via DNS round-robin.
**Design constraints:**
- Shared Ed25519 private key (transferred once at setup, securely)
- PostgreSQL logical replication for active-active read/write on both mirrors
- Both mirrors can issue JWTs (same signing key)
- DNS round-robin (2+ A records on meshbay.org)
- If one mirror goes down, the other continues serving
**Not implemented now.** The design must not prevent future implementation:
- Hub config and private key paths must be externalizable
- No hub-specific state that can't be replicated
- JWT verification must not depend on hub-local state
---
## Phase 11 — Android client MVP
**Objective:** Android app for account creation, group browsing, file download,
chat. No node functionality on mobile (client-only).
**Stack:** Kotlin native + Jetpack Compose. QUIC via `quiche` (Cloudflare, Rust
JNI binding). Crypto via Bouncy Castle JVM. Same NAT traversal as desktop native
clients (`punch_nat` + QUIC).
| # | Component | Tech | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1 | Hub client (auth, groups, GEK) | Kotlin + Retrofit | High |
| 11.2 | Crypto (Ed25519, X25519, ChaCha20) | Bouncy Castle JVM | High |
| 11.3 | QUIC client | quiche (Rust JNI) | High |
| 11.4 | NAT traversal (STUN + punch) | Kotlin native UDP | High |
| 11.5 | File browser + download | Kotlin + streaming IO | High |
| 11.6 | Chat UI | Jetpack Compose | Medium |
| 11.7 | Contact list integration | Android Contacts API (permission-gated) | Medium |
| 11.8 | Account creation from app | Registration flow + keypair bundle | High |
**Cross-device compatibility:** the user may switch between web and Android.
The `keypair_bundle` (encrypted, stored on hub) enables this — same credentials,
same keys on both platforms. Notification state and read markers should sync
via hub (small encrypted blob per user, minimal storage).
**Upload from mobile:** posting photos/videos to a group. The mobile uploads to
the group's node(s), not to the hub. The node stores it. MNP protocol extended
with an `upload` message type for client→node push.
**Out of scope:** node functionality on mobile, Mac/iPhone support.
---
## Phase 12 — Network resilience (optional, low priority)
**Objective:** handle edge cases — symmetric NAT (CGNAT mobile), TURN relay,
0-RTT reconnection. Not needed for typical residential users.
| # | Component | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| 12.1 | Mesh Relay TURN server | Low |
| 12.2 | Relay registration via MHP | Low |
| 12.3 | Node fallback to relay after ICE failure | Low |
| 12.4 | QUIC 0-RTT (session tickets) | Medium |
| 12.5 | Connection pool (1 QUIC conn = N requests) | Medium |
| 12.6 | Test CGNAT mobile 4G | Low |
**Note:** enterprise users behind restrictive firewalls can configure port
forwarding themselves. This phase targets the ~15% of residential connections
where even ICE/STUN fails (symmetric NAT behind CGNAT). Not a priority —
the user explicitly deprioritized this.
---
## Phase 13 — RPM/DEB packaging + CI
| # | Component |
|---|---|
| 13.1 | RPM build pipeline (Fedora, RHEL) |
| 13.2 | DEB build pipeline (Ubuntu, Debian) |
| 13.3 | GitHub Actions CI (pytest + ruff on PR) |
| 13.4 | Release signing (GPG key) |
| 13.5 | Repo apt/dnf on meshbay.org/packages/ |
| 13.6 | Android APK distribution on meshbay.org/downloads/ |
---
## Recommended order
```
Phase 9 (Web client) ← core product: browser P2P to nodes
Phase 10 (Site + admin UI) ← public-facing site, moderation, admin
Phase 11 (Android) ← mobile client, long effort
Phase 13 (Packaging) ← distribution
Phase 12 (Resilience) ← optional, edge cases only
```
Phase 9 is the critical path. Milestone 9.5 (spike: browser → NAT → node file
transfer) is the single most important validation in the project. If it works,
the web client is viable. If not, the architecture needs fundamental rethinking.
---
## Structural decisions (all resolved)
1. Multi-group on a single QUIC port ✅ (Phase 7)
2. Signaling punch/connect via hub WS ✅ (Phase 7)
3. Chat is a core feature, not a module ✅ (draft v3)
4. Chat encryption: Sender Keys ✅ (security review)
5. JWT group claims required ✅ (security review)
6. Admin model: config-based ✅ (Phase 8)
7. Refresh token rotation: family-based ✅ (Phase 8)
8. Email encrypted at rest: AES-256-GCM ✅ (Phase 8)
9. Argon2id params: 256 MB, pw_version for migration ✅ (Phase 8)
10. **Browser transport: WebRTC DataChannel + ICE/STUN** ✅ (decided 2026-08-10)
11. **Hub role: registrar + signaling ONLY, never in data path** ✅ (reinforced 2026-08-10)
12. **Chat stored on nodes, not hub** ✅ (decided 2026-08-10)
13. **Web UI: Preact SPA, dark/light, responsive, i18n** ✅ (decided 2026-08-10)
14. **Site overlay: meshbay.org-specific pages separate from generic hub** ✅ (decided 2026-08-10)
|