aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node')
-rw-r--r--packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/roster.py81
-rw-r--r--packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/transport/webrtc_server.py64
2 files changed, 140 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/roster.py b/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/roster.py
index af87f92..2288ae4 100644
--- a/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/roster.py
+++ b/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/roster.py
@@ -75,6 +75,22 @@ CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS identities (
-- Which already-pinned key countersigned this one into existence. Empty for
-- the first device of an account, which an operator code admitted.
added_by_pk TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+ -- The countersignature itself, and the two fields needed to rebuild what it
+ -- signed. `added_by_pk` alone says *which* key approved and proves nothing:
+ -- a third party cannot check a signature it does not have. And the
+ -- transcript binds `nonce_node` — the approving connection's handshake
+ -- nonce — so even a stored signature is unverifiable without it.
+ --
+ -- This is what Tier 2 needs (docs/desktop-client-v1.md §4.8): relayed with
+ -- the roster, it lets a member verify for themselves that a second device
+ -- belongs to an account whose first device they have already pinned,
+ -- instead of taking the node's word. Verified and discarded until
+ -- 2026-09-07; a device pinned before that has no evidence and is
+ -- trust-on-first-use only, which the client is told rather than left to
+ -- infer.
+ add_sig TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+ add_nonce TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+ add_ts INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
revoked_at TEXT,
PRIMARY KEY (user_id, pk_ed25519)
);
@@ -231,6 +247,22 @@ class Roster:
# `pk` is the column's position in the primary key, 0 when not part of it.
key_columns = {r[1] for r in info if r[5]}
+ # The countersignature evidence (Tier 2), added 2026-09-07. Done
+ # **before** the early return below, which fires on any roster already
+ # widened to one row per device — i.e. on every node that has run since
+ # 2026-08-18, which is all of them. Putting these inside that branch
+ # would have meant they never arrived, and the symptom would have been a
+ # roster response whose devices all read as unverifiable.
+ for column in ("add_sig", "add_nonce"):
+ if column not in columns:
+ await self._db.execute(
+ f"ALTER TABLE identities ADD COLUMN {column} "
+ f"TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT ''")
+ if "add_ts" not in columns:
+ await self._db.execute(
+ "ALTER TABLE identities ADD COLUMN add_ts INTEGER NOT NULL "
+ "DEFAULT 0")
+
if key_columns == {"user_id", "pk_ed25519"} and "revoked_at" in columns:
return
@@ -278,6 +310,9 @@ class Roster:
*,
label: str = "",
added_by_pk: str = "",
+ add_sig: str = "",
+ add_nonce: str = "",
+ add_ts: int = 0,
) -> None:
"""
Record a device for an account.
@@ -291,10 +326,10 @@ class Roster:
await self._db.execute(
"INSERT OR REPLACE INTO identities "
"(user_id, username, pk_ed25519, pk_x25519, pinned_at, pinned_via, "
- " label, added_by_pk, revoked_at) "
- "VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, NULL)",
+ " label, added_by_pk, add_sig, add_nonce, add_ts, revoked_at) "
+ "VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, NULL)",
(user_id, username, pk_ed25519, pk_x25519, _now(), via,
- label, added_by_pk),
+ label, added_by_pk, add_sig, add_nonce, add_ts),
)
await self._db.commit()
@@ -367,6 +402,46 @@ class Roster:
await self._db.commit()
return cur.rowcount > 0
+ async def group_devices(self, group_id: str) -> list[dict]:
+ """
+ Every live device of every active member of one group, with the evidence
+ that admitted it.
+
+ For Tier 2 (`docs/desktop-client-v1.md` §4.8), and therefore
+ **member-visible** — unlike `list_identities`, which answers the
+ operator. Two consequences of that, and both are the price of the
+ feature rather than oversights:
+
+ - it tells every member of a group how many devices each other member
+ holds, and their public keys. It stays inside the group, and the hub
+ is not involved;
+ - it is scoped to *this* group. A person in two groups on one node is
+ not disclosed to the second by being in the first.
+
+ `add_sig`/`add_nonce`/`add_ts` are empty for a device pinned before the
+ evidence was kept, and for the first device of any account — which an
+ operator code admitted, not a countersignature. Both read as
+ "trust on first use" to a client, which is what they are; the client
+ must not silently treat an absent signature as a valid one.
+ """
+ assert self._db
+ async with self._db.execute(
+ "SELECT i.user_id, i.username, i.pk_ed25519, i.pk_x25519, "
+ " i.added_by_pk, i.add_sig, i.add_nonce, i.add_ts, i.pinned_at "
+ "FROM identities i "
+ "JOIN members m ON m.user_id = i.user_id "
+ "WHERE m.group_id = ? AND m.status = 'active' "
+ " AND i.revoked_at IS NULL "
+ "ORDER BY i.user_id, i.pinned_at", (group_id,)
+ ) as cur:
+ rows = await cur.fetchall()
+ return [
+ {"user_id": r[0], "username": r[1], "pk_ed25519": r[2],
+ "pk_x25519": r[3], "added_by_pk": r[4], "add_sig": r[5],
+ "add_nonce": r[6], "add_ts": r[7], "pinned_at": r[8]}
+ for r in rows
+ ]
+
async def list_identities(self) -> list[dict]:
assert self._db
async with self._db.execute(
diff --git a/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/transport/webrtc_server.py b/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/transport/webrtc_server.py
index 4e4a23f..dfabe9b 100644
--- a/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/transport/webrtc_server.py
+++ b/packages/meshbay-node/src/meshbay_node/transport/webrtc_server.py
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ from meshbay_common.device import (
device_hello_transcript,
device_request_transcript,
)
-from meshbay_common.groupbox import PURPOSE_ACK, PURPOSE_CHAT_KEYS, seal
+from meshbay_common.groupbox import (
+ PURPOSE_ACK,
+ PURPOSE_CHAT_KEYS,
+ PURPOSE_ROSTER,
+ seal,
+)
from meshbay_common.join import (
JOIN_TTL,
ROLE_MEMBER,
@@ -571,6 +576,8 @@ class WebRTCPeerSession:
self._do_chat_epoch(msg)
elif mtype == MNP.CHAT_KEYS_REQ:
self._spawn(self._do_chat_keys_req(msg))
+ elif mtype == MNP.GROUP_ROSTER_REQ:
+ self._spawn(self._do_group_roster_req(msg))
elif mtype == MNP.MEDIA_META_REQ:
self._spawn(self._do_media_meta_request(msg))
elif mtype == MNP.SEASON_META_REQ:
@@ -1456,10 +1463,23 @@ class WebRTCPeerSession:
"detail": "That request is no longer pending"})
return
+ # The countersignature is **kept**, with the two fields needed to rebuild
+ # what it signed. Until 2026-09-07 it was verified here and thrown away,
+ # leaving only `added_by_pk` — which says *which* key approved and
+ # proves nothing to anyone else. `device_add_transcript` binds
+ # `nonce_node`, this connection's handshake nonce, so a stored signature
+ # without it is still unverifiable; that is why all three go in.
+ #
+ # This is what lets another member check for themselves that this device
+ # belongs to an account whose earlier device they have already pinned,
+ # instead of taking the node's word (Tier 2, desktop-client-v1.md §4.8).
await roster.pin_identity(
user_id=self._user_id, username=self._username or "",
pk_ed25519=pk_ed_b64, pk_x25519=pk_x_b64, via="device",
- label=str(msg.get("label", ""))[:64], added_by_pk=signer)
+ label=str(msg.get("label", ""))[:64], added_by_pk=signer,
+ add_sig=str(msg.get("sig", "")),
+ add_nonce=base64.b64encode(self._nonce_node).decode(),
+ add_ts=ts)
self._audit("device_added", f"{pk_ed_b64[:16]} by {signer[:16]}")
log.info("Device added for %s: %s (approved by %s)",
self._user_id[:8], pk_ed_b64[:16], signer[:16])
@@ -2522,6 +2542,46 @@ class WebRTCPeerSession:
self._broadcast_to_group({"type": MNP.CHAT_EPOCH_ACK,
"v": MNP_VERSION, "epoch": result["epoch"]})
+ async def _do_group_roster_req(self, msg: dict) -> None:
+ """
+ Who is in this group, and which device keys they hold.
+
+ Answers **any member**, not only the operator — that is the whole point.
+ A member verifies for themselves that a message came from a device
+ belonging to the account it claims, instead of taking the node's
+ `sender_id` on trust. What makes that possible is relayed here: each
+ device's key, which already-pinned key countersigned it, and the
+ signature plus the nonce and timestamp needed to rebuild what was
+ signed.
+
+ Sealed under a GEK-derived subkey, for the same reason the index is: it
+ is the group's membership, and a peer that has not completed the
+ handshake has no business reading it.
+
+ What this deliberately does not do is *decide* anything. The node hands
+ over evidence; the client checks the chain and keeps its own pins. A
+ node that lies here is caught by a client that has seen the account
+ before, which is the property Tier 2 buys and the reason the node is not
+ asked to assert trust.
+ """
+ gctx = self._group_ctx()
+ gek = gctx.get("gek")
+ roster = self._ctx.get("roster")
+ if not gek:
+ self._send({"type": "error", "detail": "Group encryption not initialized"})
+ return
+ if roster is None:
+ self._send({"type": "error", "detail": "Roster not available"})
+ return
+
+ devices = await roster.group_devices(self._group_id or "")
+ payload = {"devices": devices,
+ "node_pk": self._node_pk_b64()}
+ sealed = seal(gek, PURPOSE_ROSTER, MNP.GROUP_ROSTER_RESP,
+ self._group_id or "", payload)
+ self._send({"type": MNP.GROUP_ROSTER_RESP, "v": MNP_VERSION,
+ "group_id": self._group_id or "", **sealed})
+
async def _do_chat_keys_req(self, msg: dict) -> None:
"""
Hand this member every chat epoch key the group has, sealed.