aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/meshbay-node/tests/test_stream_seek_reports_the_keyframe.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* refactor(node): move video streaming out of webrtc_serverChristophe Besson25 hours1-4/+2
| | | | | | | StreamingMixin in transport/webrtc/apps/streaming.py: stream credit, handover, the transcode slots and _stream_video_inner, moved unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* style: ruff's own fixes, mechanically appliedChristophe Besson6 days1-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `ruff check .` had gone unrun long enough to report 568 errors, which is the same as having no linter: the next real finding would have been invisible in the noise. This is the 521 it fixes by itself, in 173 files, and nothing else — the 98 it cannot fix are the next commit. What actually changed: import sorting (225), imports nobody used (87, none of them a re-export — no `__init__.py` is touched, which was the one way this could have broken an import elsewhere), `datetime.timezone.utc` to `datetime.UTC` (69) and `asyncio.TimeoutError` to `TimeoutError` (18), both plain aliases on the 3.12 this project requires, `Optional[X]` to `X | None` (24), and f-strings with nothing to interpolate (19). Checked rather than assumed: every module in the three packages still imports, and the suite is 2893 passed — the same count, test for test, as the merge before it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(node): measure where a seek lands instead of predicting itChristophe Besson8 days1-15/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous fix read ffprobe's key frames and took the last one at or before the request. It was wrong twice, and a viewer felt the difference: subtitles went from 5 s early to 2–3 s late. Matroska's Cues index only some keyframes, so an index seek backs off to an indexed one that the frame list does not single out. And the landing point moves with **which streams are mapped**, because the container is positioned where every mapped stream has data — on the reported title, a seek to 4913.7 s landed at 4909.863 with video alone and at 4907.236 with the second audio track mapped beside it. The frame scan gave the first number; the stream delivered the second; the gap was 2.65 s, and the measured audio displacement in the served stream was 2.65 s. So the node asks ffmpeg instead: the same seek, the same mapping, one copied frame under `-copyts`, and the answer read back off the result. 0.06–0.07 s, cheaper than the scan it replaces. The `-ss` argument stays at the request, so the bytes served are exactly the ones served before — only the number naming them changes. The probe runs after the audio track is resolved, because it cannot be right before that is known. An answer after the request, or further before it than any real keyframe gap, is discarded in favour of the old label: a number wrong by seconds beats a fabricated one. Found by decoding the served stream and locating its first frame in the source, which put it at 4907.213 s against an announced 4909.863 s. The test does the same thing rather than comparing the announced number against a second reading of the same probe. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UGY17EPph5LsLzePPXhUVc
* fix(node): a seek reports where the picture begins, not where it was askedChristophe Besson8 days1-0/+181
Copied video can only start on a keyframe, so `-ss t` with `-c:v copy` delivers the keyframe at or before `t`. The node reported `t` anyway and the client builds `SourceBuffer.timestampOffset` out of that number, so everything downstream believed the picture stood a few seconds further along than it did. That was a wrong label while only the scrubber read it — it is recorded as such, low priority, in the design document. Subtitles made it a wrong answer: their cues carry the source's own absolute timestamps, so the mismatch put every line on screen before it was spoken. Reported from real use on an H264 title, where seeking to 600 s, 2650 s and 5000 s lands on keyframes 0.82 s, 1.56 s and 4.64 s earlier. The copy path now resolves the request to that keyframe, seeks to it, and reports it. The bytes delivered do not change — ffmpeg lands on the same frame either way — only the number that names them. The look-up reads the thirty seconds before the request and cost 0.12–0.51 s on that title, which is the price already costed in §15.3 and never paid. Re-encoded video is untouched: it can begin exactly where it is asked to, and does. Two details worth their lines. The keyframe is passed back to ffmpeg at six decimals, because rounding a keyframe's own timestamp down puts it before the frame it names and selects the previous one — the same fault again, smaller. And the ffprobe window ends past the request, since an interval whose end is the request never emits a keyframe sitting exactly on it: the resume position is the one place a viewer asks for the same instant twice, and it would have been answered a whole GOP early. The test decodes the first frame served and matches it against the source frame at the position announced, rather than comparing `start` to an expected number — both sides of that comparison would be reading the same ffprobe and would agree by construction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UGY17EPph5LsLzePPXhUVc